Ahead of the Online Safety Bill’s return to the Lords, Graham Smith has published a blog post aggregating his six years of blogging on the Bill’s provisions, its legal consequences, and its unintended outcomes.
As all good law and policy bloggers do, he also shares his thoughts on what these years of government’s defiant determination to make a bad law, out of bad policy, might mean for British statecraft in general, well beyond the Bill’s stated objectives.
If you’re not familiar with his blog, Graham can best be described as being like your favourite university professor – the one who pushed you, really hard, not to be an arsehole but because he genuinely wanted you to master the subject at hand. The one who asked you really tough questions because he wanted you to discard your uninformed opinions and, instead, arrive at evidence-based conclusions about the topic. The one who challenged your conclusions because he wanted to prevent you from becoming the sort of policy professional who loses an argument because you didn’t do your homework on the basic fundamentals.
Like, for example, how the Internet works.
So while Graham’s writing style is at an advanced level, you should consider that an opportunity to receive the solid education you need to understand the Bill, and possibly engage on it, in a way that will let you master the substance of the actual matter at hand.
As opposed to running too fast and too far with your (or anyone else’s) uninformed opinions about it, or worse, allowing yourself to get dragged into someone else’s equally uniformed battle.
My turn!
Graham’s idea of Easter holiday fun reminded me that I kept meaning to do something similar, aggregating my own years of writing on the topic in one convenient location, for the benefit of people who don’t know how to click on category or tag links.
However, every time I decided to do this, I ended up doing something far more productive, like staring at that bald patch of dirt in my garden, waiting for the grass seed I’ve thrown on it to take root and grow.
Magically. In front of my eyes.
Hey, don’t knock using The Force on a bit of dirt until you’ve tried it.
Still.
People don’t know how to click on category or tag links.
And I did put four years of work into legislative and policy engagement into the thing across three separate jobs.
So, for the benefit of anyone sad enough to want to read it, here are my greatest hits, b-sides, and unfinished demo tapes.
What you do with this information is up to you.
Just do it wisely.
First, the greatest hits
This post needs to be two lists, because I did a helluva lot of external media engagement in a professional capacity in 2020-2021 for my then-employer, a UK digital rights organisation.
You will find most of those links aggregated here.
I’d just like to state for the record that said employer was paying me an annual salary of £28k per year (that’s €31k EUR / $34k USD) before taxes and deductions, which was £21k (€23k EUR / $26k USD) after that, to handle this Bill and three other disparate policy portfolios, full-time, at a senior policy level.
If you run those numbers in your head, that was a net income of £437 (€495 / $532) per month per portfolio, including the Freedom of Expression/Online Safety brief.
Yes, I was making less than £450 a month to do all that writing, all that research, and all that high level policy and media engagement.
And doing so in a sterile, remote-only workplace with no camaraderie or social interaction at all, in an managerial environment characterised by avoidant behaviour, digital solutionism, and petty bikeshedding, all built on top of Liz Truss levels of people skills.
They did not see this as a problem for me. They did not see this as problem for retaining good staff. They did not see this as a problem for attracting good staff. And they did not see this as a problem for policy, and digital rights, as a whole. They didn’t get it. They really didn’t.
But perhaps you can imagine what it’s like to show up to meetings, as an equal partner, representing your organisation in good faith, while sitting (virtually) next to colleagues in the private sector and academia who earn your monthly income in a few days, whereas you are on a salary so low that you have to go into debt to work for your employer. Then those colleagues go back to healthy, functional workplaces. You don’t.
God knows how any digital rights organisation expects its people to fight the good fights, and show up prepared to the right battles, when the organisation won’t even fight for and show up for its own people.
And until they figure that out, and perhaps come around to the understanding that defending digital rights is about confronting threats to human rights face-to-face, and not hiding behind a screen playing with toys and gadgets, we’ll continue to end up with legislative messes like the one we’ve been in for far too long.
Next, the B-Sides
Here is my own personal blogging, here on my own site, of my own opinions, experiences, and reflections.
This is an automatically generated list off a shortcode, so pardon any formatting weirdness.
Other tags are available, and you might want to explore them, especially this one.
Two of these posts hit #1 on Hacker News, which is the sort of experience that makes you want to switch off your phone and go live in a cave, off the grid, until the madness dies down.
- On the marzipan dreadnought 28 August 2024Thoughts on recent UK policy events, through the looking glass.
- So you’ve got to read a 1200 page consultation 14 May 2024How to read dense and complex regulatory consultation documents which, either accidentally or deliberately, break the internet.
- How to sum up 1700 pages in four words 11 November 2023On throwing compliance obligations crafted around Big Tech at small enterprises: again.
- Online Safety enforcement consultation, round one, yay 9 November 2023Why deal with one massive piece of digital regulation in one week when you can deal with two?
- Greatest hits, b-sides, and unfinished demo tracks: or, all my blogging on the Online Safety Bill 17 April 2023All my public-facing writing on the Online Safety Bill, 2019-2023, in one place.
- The age-appropriate rubber dinghies of the sunlit uplands 7 March 2023An amendment to the Online Safety Bill uses its age verification requirements to censor subjective legal content determined by government policy. Just like we warned you years ago.
- You wise up. 3 February 2023Two prominent think tanks have walked away from the UK’s Online Safety Bill. There’s no shame in that. Because the shame would have been in staying.
- A quick hypothetical situation, or, your crash introduction to the real world 21 November 2022Here’s just one example of how the Online Safety Bill, in practice, will impact your Mastodon server.
- Online harms are hard. Meet a woman who is harder. 29 October 2022Meet my friend Mika, whose four-year ordeal at the hands of a deranged and unaccountable stalker has influenced some of my thinking on policy. It should influence yours too.
- Fixing the UK’s Online Safety Bill, part 1: we need answers. 31 July 2022These unanswered questions need to be cleared out of the way before the Bill can progress, regardless of who takes over that work next month.
- Fixing the UK’s Online Safety Bill, part 0: no, it’s not fixable. 21 July 2022Ahead of its return in September, I want to offer some constructive thoughts on how the Online Safety Bill’s weaknesses should be improved. That’s an academic exercise, though, because this Bill is not fixable.
- The week the open web won 15 July 2022No, I didn’t destroy the Online Safety Bill with this blog. I did something even better.
- Here’s why your project is in scope of the Online Safety Bill 13 July 2022An anecdote from the road about the somewhat muddled thinking that has gone into defining the Bill’s sweeping compliance requirements.
- Your compliance obligations under the UK’s Online Safety Bill; or, welcome to hell 11 July 2022Last month’s post about the UK’s upcoming age-gating system covered only one aspect of your compliance obligations under the upcoming Online Safety Bill. In this post, I’m going to tell you about the rest.
- Pop-ups are dead, long live pop-ups: or, the bait-and-switch hidden in today’s cookie announcement 17 June 2022Today DCMS announced they will legislate to get rid of European cookie pop-ups, ahead of their legislating to require you to implement British identity verification pop-ups.
- A quick take on three pretty terrifying changes to the Online Safety Bill 18 March 2022I wanted to jot down some quick takes on three aspects of the Bill which you need to know, in the sense that you will not be able to sleep tonight once you know them.
- Why the “Nick Clegg Law” is saying the quiet part out loud 11 February 2022An appeal to the better angels of your nature, wherever you’ve left them.
- The #WildWestWeb fallacy isn’t about ending online harms. It’s about enabling populism. 7 February 2022The trope of the Internet as an “unregulated wild west” is a lie, and those who ply it know it; they need it as a means to a political end.
- Yes, the Online Safety Bill is the most Conservative law yet. Here’s why. 2 February 2022The output of a system is its function.
- Content about a thing is not enticement to do it. 14 January 2022The UK is not going to make itself “the safest place in the world to be online” by censoring encyclopaedias. CW: self-harm / suicidal ideation.
- The UK’s Online Safety Bill is a “hostage-taking” law. That should terrify you. 8 November 2021Here’s how the UK is building a “world-leading” framework of brute force content moderation through arrests and show trials.
- Internet regulation debates need rules of engagement. Here’s a start. 7 November 2021I don’t know who needs to hear this, but there’s more than one company on the internet.
- Why Labour just lost the tech sector’s vote 21 October 2021Senior management liability is a deal-breaker. It should be.
- The greatest lesson the Conservatives learned from tech 20 October 2021Here’s why the UK’s politicians are leaning in so heavily to blaming the internet for last week’s murder of one of their own.
- World-leading internet diplomacy, or perhaps not 17 October 2021The enemy of my enemy is neither my friend nor a regulatory role model.
- A natter on regulations, freedom of expression, and open source software 25 September 2021My friend Morten Rand-Hendriksen and I chatted about legislative threats to freedom of expression, and their potential impacts on open source software communities and projects.
- Recent media quotes and talks 23 September 2021Links to media quotes, articles, and talks I’ve given in the past year, mostly in a professional capacity for my previous employer, on the Online Safety Bill as well as on various post-Brexit UK privacy issues.
- A thought experiment on subjectively harmful content moderation 10 July 2021Policymakers are laying the scaffolding for regulation which will censor your ability to say what’s on your mind. What better way for them to show their commitment than volunteering to go first?
- Your cut-and-keep guide to the “unregulated wild west internet” 20 April 2021The next time a policymaker tells you that the internet is an “unregulated wild west”, point them here to take the shine off their sheriff star.
- Techdirt Podcast: Intermediary liability law is not a social safety net 17 February 2021I went on the Techdirt podcast to discuss the recent push, by governments and media alike, to scapegoat intermediary liability law where social safety nets have failed.
- Facebook Derangement Syndrome 9 December 2020A status update from the front lines of tech policy. It’s about time I coined a phrase, so here it is. Facebook Derangement Syndrome is when lawmakers, politicians, policymakers, and civil servants are completely, totally, entirely, pathologically, myopically, hysterically obsessed, to the point of actual psychiatric derangement, with Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg. Every legal, policy, and technical proposal ...
- The Online Harms framework just got a lot darker 28 September 2019Something distressing happened this week in the Commons chamber, and the Prime Minister wasn’t even there. In a response to conduct on Wednesday I will not dignify, a debate was held on Thursday concerning the Prime Minister’s role in creating a safe environment for Parliamentarians. The full Hansard transcript is here. It fell to a junior cabinet ...
The unfinished demo tapes
There are plenty more observations I have to make and things I want to say, in the way Graham has done, that go beyond the substance of the Bill itself to the wider implications for law and policy as a whole. I have a Scrivener binder full of notes, drafts, and hesitant thoughts.
However, you won’t be seeing them, because I’ve got nothing left.
I have now been unemployed and full-time job hunting for seven months, following a bad stint with a bad employer. (Everything about them from the start was a parade of red flags, however I had to claw myself out of the debt I had to go into to work at the digital rights organisation.)
At this point, after seven months of having no work and no professional or personal support, my mental and physical heath are shattered. Daily gym workouts are the only thing keeping me vertical. Aside from that, I’m completely drained and empty, emotionally and financially: I am back to skipping bills, just like old times.
So if you’re expecting further b-sides, stop waiting.
Or hire me to start producing hits again.
Or buy my book: preferably the ebook version, as it pays higher royalties.
Or read those blog posts, educate yourself, and pick up the fight here, now, at the point where others have paved the ground for you.
For my part, I hope I did it well.